{"id":31027,"title":"Assessment of Student Performance in Higher Education","content":"

At \u00a0National University of Uzbekistan, the student assessment system has been developed in accordance with international standards. Currently, student evaluation is based on a 5-point grading scale, which is then converted to a 100-point scale.<\/p>\n

This grading system is based on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System, ensuring alignment with international higher education systems. This integration supports academic mobility and facilitates the recognition of student grades by foreign universities.<\/p>\n

During the development of this system, the grading models of countries such as Russia, the USA, the UK, Japan, and South Korea were studied, and their best practices were incorporated. As a result, students’ academic performance is assessed fairly not only by national but also by international standards.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

https:\/\/lex.uz\/docs\/391679<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Table <\/strong>2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Supreme<\/strong> in education<\/strong> students<\/strong> to master<\/strong> assessment<\/strong> systems<\/strong> comparative<\/strong> comparison <\/strong>
\n<\/strong>TABLE<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Proposal being pushed Uzbekistan system<\/strong><\/td>\nRussian system<\/strong><\/p>\n

(MSU)*<\/strong><\/td>\n

Europe<\/strong> credit<\/strong> transfer<\/strong> system <\/strong>(ECTS \u2014 European Credit Transfer System)<\/strong><\/td>\nAmerican system<\/strong><\/p>\n

(A-F)<\/strong><\/td>\n

British system<\/strong><\/p>\n

(%)<\/strong><\/td>\n

Japanese system<\/strong><\/p>\n

(%)<\/strong><\/td>\n

Korean
\nsystem<\/strong>(%)<\/strong><\/td>\n		Uzbekistan system<\/strong><\/p>\n

(%)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

“5”<\/td>\n“5”<\/td>\n“A”<\/td>\n“A+”<\/td>\n70 \u2014 100<\/td>\n80 \u2014 100<\/td>\n90 \u2014 100<\/td>\n90 \u2014 100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“A”<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“A-“<\/td>\n65 \u2014 69<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“4”<\/td>\n“4”<\/td>\n“B”<\/td>\n“B+”<\/td>\n60 \u2014 64<\/td>\n70 \u2014 79<\/td>\n80 \u2014 89<\/td>\n70 \u2014 89.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“C”<\/td>\n“B”<\/td>\n50 \u2014 59<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“B-“<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“3”<\/td>\n“3”<\/td>\n“D”<\/td>\n“C+”<\/td>\n45 \u2014 49<\/td>\n60 \u2014 69<\/td>\n70 \u2014 79<\/td>\n60 \u2014 69.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“E”<\/td>\n“C”<\/td>\n40 \u2014 44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“C-“<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“D+”<\/td>\n60 \u2014 69<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“D”<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“D-“<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“2”<\/td>\n“2”<\/td>\n“FX”<\/td>\n“F”<\/td>\n0 \u2014 39<\/td>\n0 \u2014 59<\/td>\n0 \u2014 59<\/td>\n0 \u2014 59.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“F”<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n<\/strong>5- point scale<\/strong><\/td>\n		100- point scale<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n5- point scale<\/strong><\/td>\n100- point scale<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n5- point scale<\/strong><\/td>\n100- point scale<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.00 \u2014 4.96<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n4.30 \u2014 4.26<\/td>\n86<\/td>\n3.60 \u2014 3.56<\/td>\n72<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.95 \u2014 4.91<\/td>\n99<\/td>\n4.25 \u2014 4.21<\/td>\n85<\/td>\n3.55 \u2014 3.51<\/td>\n71<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.90 \u2014 4.86<\/td>\n98<\/td>\n4.20 \u2014 4.16<\/td>\n84<\/td>\n3.50 \u2014 3.46<\/td>\n70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.85 \u2014 4.81<\/td>\n97<\/td>\n4.15 \u2014 4.11<\/td>\n83<\/td>\n3.45 \u2014 3.41<\/td>\n69<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.80 \u2014 4.76<\/td>\n96<\/td>\n4.10 \u2014 4.06<\/td>\n82<\/td>\n3.40 \u2014 3.36<\/td>\n68<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.75 \u2014 4.71<\/td>\n95<\/td>\n4.05 \u2014 4.01<\/td>\n81<\/td>\n3.35 \u2014 3.31<\/td>\n67<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.70 \u2014 4.66<\/td>\n94<\/td>\n4.00 \u2014 3.96<\/td>\n80<\/td>\n3.30 \u2014 3.26<\/td>\n66<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.65 \u2014 4.61<\/td>\n93<\/td>\n3.95 \u2014 3.91<\/td>\n79<\/td>\n3.25 \u2014 3.21<\/td>\n65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.60 \u2014 4.56<\/td>\n92<\/td>\n3.90 \u2014 3.86<\/td>\n78<\/td>\n3.20 \u2014 3.16<\/td>\n64<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.55 \u2014 4.51<\/td>\n91<\/td>\n3.85 \u2014 3.81<\/td>\n77<\/td>\n3.15 \u2014 3.11<\/td>\n63<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.50 \u2014 4.46<\/td>\n90<\/td>\n3.80 \u2014 3.76<\/td>\n76<\/td>\n3.10 \u2014 3.06<\/td>\n62<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.45 \u2014 4.41<\/td>\n89<\/td>\n3.75 \u2014 3.71<\/td>\n75<\/td>\n3.05 \u2014 3.01<\/td>\n61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.40 \u2014 4.36<\/td>\n88<\/td>\n3.70 \u2014 3.66<\/td>\n74<\/td>\n3.00<\/td>\n60<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.35 \u2014 4.31<\/td>\n87<\/td>\n3.65 \u2014 3.61<\/td>\n73<\/td>\nLess than 3.0<\/strong><\/td>\nLess than 60<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","date":"2025-07-29 16:19:30","image":null}